Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · Montana

Montana Fence Billings Branch

Kalispell, MT · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Montana Fence Billings Branch runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade C.

Montana Fence Billings Branch: 3.3 TCR = 118% of Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Montana Fence Billings Branch safety composite

Montana Fence Billings Branch scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2022→2024

Montana Fence Billings Branch injury rate improved

Montana Fence Billings Branch's TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.5 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Kalispell, MT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 118% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/10
  • PHOTO Trudeau's Fence Comp…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trudeau's Fence Company, Ltd. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Montana Fence Billings Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Montana Fence Billings Branch averages 3.3 TCR (118% of the Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Montana Fence Billings Branch TCR series: 2022=3.5 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Montana Fence Billings Branch falls in its industry

1,634 Fence installation (except ele establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 10 Fence installation (except ele employers in Montana.

Montana Fence Billings Branch (30 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Montana Fence Billings Branch
Montana Fence Billings Branch (30 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Montana Fence Billings Branch has fewer employees than the Fence installation (except electronic co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.5 3.2 2 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · MT · Kalispell

1,634 Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 117 employers in Kalispell, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trudeau's Fence Company, Ltd. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smedley Crane and Rigging 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WYNN AND SONS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION, INC. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hard Rock Sawing and Drilling Specialists Co 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Avista Noxon 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heorot Power Management - Hardin 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hammerquist Casalegno LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Heating Cooling Plumbing and Electrical 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kalispell Regional Medical Center 2,715 FTE
CITY-NEAR Logan Health Medical Center (formerly Kalispell Regional Medical Center) 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Logan Health (formerly Kalispell Regional Healthcare-System) 494 FTE
CITY-NEAR MTK01, Applied Materials, Semi Tool Main 406 FTE
NAT-TCR Lowes Foods #265 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Clarke Power Services-127 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Perryville, MD 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health Cranbury 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Life Science Products, Inc 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Turf Sales of Florida 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE JES Engineering Contractors 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Front Range Energy LLC 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.