Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · California

MAG Aerospace Industries LLC

Carson, CA · ~346 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MAG Aerospace Industries LLC runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

MAG Aerospace Industries LLC: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MAG Aerospace Industries LLC safety composite

MAG Aerospace Industries LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MAG Aerospace Industries LLC held a steady TCR band

MAG Aerospace Industries LLC's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.9 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.9 · 2021=2.8 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Carson, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #27/104
  • PHOTO ITI Engineering LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~346 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ITI Engineering LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

MAG Aerospace Industries LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MAG Aerospace Industries LLC averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MAG Aerospace Industries LLC TCR series: 2017=0.9 · 2021=2.8 · 2023=1 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where MAG Aerospace Industries LLC falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 104 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in California.

MAG Aerospace Industries LLC (346 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate MAG Aerospace Industries LLC
MAG Aerospace Industries LLC (346 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

MAG Aerospace Industries LLC has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 3 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 4 0 0
2017 0.9 0.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · CA · Carson

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 236 employers in Carson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ITI Engineering LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BE Aerospace - Anaheim 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meggitt (North Hollywood), INC. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Triumph Aerostructures - Tulsa, LLC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE RJP Framing 346 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carnegie -Brasstech 346 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carbon Redwood City 346 FTE
STATE-SIZE SME LA 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Refinery Carson 1,083 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMPAM Parks Mechanical 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Carson 755 FTE
NAT-TCR Carlstedt's, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel Duval Tallahasse 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Regional Plaza - C 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Michigan Brick 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DHO3 346 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hanesbrands, Inc 521 Distribution Center 346 FTE
NAT-SIZE double kwik Hindman 1 346 FTE
NAT-SIZE OB 346 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.