Hotels (except casino hotels) · North Carolina

Marriott At the Civic Center

Durham, NC · ~62 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marriott At the Civic Center runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade C.

Marriott At the Civic Center: 2.9 TCR = 96% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marriott At the Civic Center safety composite

Marriott At the Civic Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Marriott At the Civic Center held a steady TCR band

Marriott At the Civic Center's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.2 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Durham, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 96% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #81/239
  • PHOTO Courtyard Sarasota
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Courtyard Sarasota (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Marriott At the Civic Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marriott At the Civic Center averages 2.9 TCR (96% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marriott At the Civic Center TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.0

Where Marriott At the Civic Center falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 239 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in North Carolina.

Marriott At the Civic Center (62 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Marriott At the Civic Center
Marriott At the Civic Center (62 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Marriott At the Civic Center has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.1 0.0 0 1 0
2020 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2016 3.2 3.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NC · Durham

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Courtyard Sarasota 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampton Inn and Suites - Cary 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marriott Shoals Hotel and Spa 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Thayer Hotel 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CENTRAL PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT -EST 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boseman Farms, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Durham 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville - New Bern 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR Bostik Paulsboro 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MPN Incorporated 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kodiak Service Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tice Electric Company 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE CNNC, Inc. dba Corning Therapy and Living Center 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chocolove - 1180 S 57th Court 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 154 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 136 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.