Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities · California

Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health

San Francisco, CA · ~134 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health: 1.6 TCR = 41% of Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health safety composite

Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2017→2023

Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health injury rate improved

Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health's TCR fell 3.6 from 3.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.6 · 2018=2.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/230
  • PHOTO DD In-home Services
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DD In-home Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health averages 1.6 TCR (41% of the Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health TCR series: 2017=3.6 · 2018=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health falls in its industry

1,320 Services for the Elderly and P establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 230 Services for the Elderly and P employers in California.

Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health (134 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health
Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health (134 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health has more employees than the Services for the Elderly and Persons wit median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 4 0 0
2017 3.6 3.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · San Francisco

1,320 Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DD In-home Services 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Social Vocational Services #154 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office - 01 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 123 Home Care Services Los Angeles I, LLC 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE ag land inc 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capstone Ranch 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nissen Vineyard Services Inc. 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE H & C Ag, Inc. 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR The Procter & Gamble Paper Products 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DPR Construction - Greenville 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ODC Network 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aviation Exteriors Louisiana 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Humanetics Huron 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Bay Packaging - Cincinnati 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE L3 Technologies - Offutt 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Price Chopper #10 - PC10 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.