Construction management, single-family building · South Carolina

DPR Construction - Greenville

Greenville, SC · ~42 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DPR Construction - Greenville runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, single-family building workplace, earning a grade A.

DPR Construction - Greenville: 1.6 TCR = 41% of Construction management, single-family building BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DPR Construction - Greenville safety composite

DPR Construction - Greenville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DPR Construction - Greenville: 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.96× in 2023

DPR Construction - Greenville's TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 41% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #5/10
  • PHOTO D.R. Horton, Inc. - …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: D.R. Horton, Inc. - Hilton Head Savannah (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

DPR Construction - Greenville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DPR Construction - Greenville averages 1.6 TCR (41% of the Construction management, single-family building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DPR Construction - Greenville TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where DPR Construction - Greenville falls in its industry

976 Construction management, singl establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 Construction management, singl employers in South Carolina.

DPR Construction - Greenville (42 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DPR Construction - Greenville
DPR Construction - Greenville (42 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

DPR Construction - Greenville has fewer employees than the Construction management, single-family b median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2022 4.7 2.3 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · SC · Greenville

976 Construction management, single-family building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - Hilton Head Savannah 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MSP-DWH-MINNESOTA-ST. PAUL 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR John W. Paulson Community 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMPCOL, Inc 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Titan Production Company, LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newberry Electric Cooperative,Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Resource Center PNG 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group South Carolina, LLC- Charleston Division 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Procter & Gamble Paper Products 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aviation Exteriors Louisiana 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cargill Animal Nutrition, KC-Feed 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crossover Health @ High Crest 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parker Steel Company 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2412-Hyatt Place/House Denver Dt 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE SPR Kansas City 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.