Commercial flexographic printing (except books) · North Carolina

Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc.

High Point, NC · ~70 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc. runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial flexographic printing (except books) workplace, earning a grade B.

Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc.: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Commercial flexographic printing (except books) BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc. safety composite

Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2021 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · High Point, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/92
  • PHOTO Pittsburg Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pittsburg Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc. averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Commercial flexographic printing (except books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc. TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=3 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc. falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial flexographic printi establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 92 Commercial flexographic printi employers in North Carolina.

Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc. (70 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc.
Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc. (70 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Maxim Label & Packaging High Point, Inc. has fewer employees than the Commercial flexographic printing (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2022 4.5 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NC · High Point

2,001 Commercial flexographic printing (except books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pittsburg Plant 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quantum Color Graphics , LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brenham 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orange County Printing 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE SHARP FARM INC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jackson Farming Company 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACT Power Services, LLC 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR 149 Lci 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR GREER 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Warehouse Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Equipment Depot Wisconsin, Inc. - Corporate 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jay Wolfe Imports LLC (Honda) 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Universal Plastics 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE RidgeLine Direct Inc. 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.