Automotive manufacturing · Michigan

Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+)

Wayne, MI · ~4,031 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Automotive manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+): 5.0 TCR = 150% of Automotive manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) safety composite

Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) held a steady TCR band

Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+)'s TCR held near 0.2 from 5.2 in 2017 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336111 · Wayne, MI ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 150% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #16/26
  • PHOTO Toyota Motor Mfg Wes…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1,045 inj
  • SIZE ~4,031 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Toyota Motor Mfg West Virginia, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) averages 5.0 TCR (150% of the Automotive manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=5 · 2023=4 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) falls in its industry

158 Automotive manufacturing establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 26 Automotive manufacturing employers in Michigan.

Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) (4,031 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+)
Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) (4,031 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) has more employees than the Automotive manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 4.0 240 91 0
2023 4.0 2.7 127 45 0
2022 5.0 3.5 178 73 0
2021 4.8 3.1 148 58 0
2020 4.2 2.5 64 40 0
2019 7.5 4.2 119 119 0
2018 3.7 1.4 65 26 0
2017 5.2 1.8 104 48 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336111 · MI · Wayne

158 Automotive manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 34 employers in Wayne, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Toyota Motor Mfg West Virginia, Inc 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autokiniton Blissfield 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marelli 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tower Automotive Clinton Township 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nexteer Automotive Saginaw Site 4,015 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edison Plaza 4,066 FTE
STATE-SIZE PDC - PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CENTER DESIGN 3,940 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flint Assembly 3,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-2 1,082 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaJoy Group, Wayne 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR GFL Environmental USA Inc. - Wayne, MI 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR GFL Environmental Wayne 226 FTE
NAT-TCR Greenwich - Byram 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston HOU 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Browning Service and Distribution Center 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant ST 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. David's North Austin Medical Center 4,020 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northside Forsyth 4,043 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wright Tree Service, Inc 4,019 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center 4,049 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.