Public parole offices · Michigan

Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole

Detroit, MI · ~119 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Public parole offices workplace, earning a grade D.

Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole: 4.3 TCR = 133% of Public parole offices BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole safety composite

Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2019

Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole injury rate improved

Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole's TCR fell 1.4 from 5.0 in 2017 to 3.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.0 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922150 · Detroit, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 133% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #14/15
  • PHOTO Hartford District Of…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hartford District Office (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole averages 4.3 TCR (133% of the Public parole offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole TCR series: 2017=5 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=3.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole falls in its industry

81 Public parole offices establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 15 Public parole offices employers in Michigan.

Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole (119 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole
Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole (119 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole has more employees than the Public parole offices median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.5 0.9 4 0 0
2018 4.3 0.8 5 0 0
2017 5.0 1.6 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922150 · MI · Detroit

81 Public parole offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hartford District Office 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adult Probation 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Operations Maryland Correctional Transportation Unit 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6458-ZCAD 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Autumnwood of McBain 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0632 - Port Huron 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Side Beer Distributing-Grand Rapids 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR Monroe Piping & Sheet Metal LLC 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - OK027 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0029 2214 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 259 - Mishawaka 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Henderson Facility 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Admiral Heating & Ventilating, Inc. 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4113-41131003-R43 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6962-Swy 0029 2261 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.