Rehabilitation services, correctional, government · Minnesota

Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility

Jordan, MN · ~19 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Rehabilitation services, correctional, government workplace, earning a grade D.

Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility: 4.0 TCR = 126% of Rehabilitation services, correctional, government BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility safety composite

Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility held a steady TCR band

Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility's TCR held near 0.3 from 6.8 in 2020 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.8 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922150 · Jordan, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 126% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Michigan Department …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Michigan Department of Corrections - Monroe County Parole/Probation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility averages 4.0 TCR (126% of the Rehabilitation services, correctional, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility TCR series: 2020=6.8 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility falls in its industry

81 Rehabilitation services, corre establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Rehabilitation services, corre employers in Minnesota.

Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility (19 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility
Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility (19 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility has fewer employees than the Rehabilitation services, correctional, g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 6.5 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.8 6.8 1 0 0
2020 6.8 6.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922150 · MN · Jordan

81 Rehabilitation services, correctional, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 28 employers in Jordan, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Michigan Department of Corrections - Monroe County Parole/Probation 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Multnomah County Bldg 161 / Mead Building 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Probation Department 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Central Container 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakefield Veterinary Group - 154 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brandons Assisted Living 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6276-62768000-005028 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jordan Public Schools, ISD #717 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR S.M. Hentges & Sons Inc 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR By the Yard, Inc. 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minger Construction Co., Inc. 102 FTE
NAT-TCR Globe Products Co., Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MLC-RIV 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Warshauer Electric Supply Co. Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1283 - Murrieta 4.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.