Public probation offices · Michigan

Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation

Pontiac, MI · ~62 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Public probation offices workplace, earning a grade B.

Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation: 2.0 TCR = 63% of Public probation offices BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation safety composite

Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation held a steady TCR band

Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.6 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.6 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922150 · Pontiac, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 63% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #5/15
  • PHOTO District 25 Probatio…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: District 25 Probation & Parole (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation averages 2.0 TCR (63% of the Public probation offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation falls in its industry

81 Public probation offices establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 15 Public probation offices employers in Michigan.

Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation (62 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation
Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation (62 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Probation has fewer employees than the Public probation offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.8 1.6 3 0 0
2017 1.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922150 · MI · Pontiac

81 Public probation offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 95 employers in Pontiac, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR District 25 Probation & Parole 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maricopa County - Adult Probation (110) 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR New London Adult Probation 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michigan Department of Corrections - Southwest District Probation 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fischer Tanks LLC 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Fires Elementary School 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Max & Erma's Partridge Creek 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE 258237-ROY-MADISON HTS CARRIER ANX 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DET3 2,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Powertrain Headquaters 2,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital SJMHS MI 2,521 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND 1,290 FTE
NAT-TCR Highlands Drilling, LLC. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR RCN Telecom Services, LLC - Bethlehem Ave C. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Olsen Fire Protection 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer #168 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE NGC-Portsmouth 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avamere St. Helens 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pac - Il 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilmiington Terminal 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.