Printed circuit boards loading · Minnesota
Micro Control Company
Fridley, MN · ~177 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 2.8
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Micro Control Company runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Printed circuit boards loading workplace, earning a grade C.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 2.8
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 32
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Micro Control Company's OSHA Total Case Rate of 2.8 to the Printed circuit boards loading BLS benchmark of 3.3 (84% of benchmark) across 8 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Micro Control Company's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Micro Control Company falls in its industry
305 Printed circuit boards loading establishmentsSafer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 18 Printed circuit boards loading employers in Minnesota.
Trend analysis for Micro Control Company
Between 2017 and 2024, Micro Control Company's Total Case Rate worsened from 1.4 to 4.8 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 250% increase across 7 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2020, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2021 saw the highest rate, at 6.8, a spread of 6.8 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 8 reporting years, Micro Control Company recorded 32 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 8-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 32 injuries, 7 illnesses shown on this page for Micro Control Company are sourced from its own 8 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 334418 - Printed circuit boards loading.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
8 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 420,552 hours worked = 3.80 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Micro Control Company (this establishment) | 2.78 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 8-year avg |
| Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 334418 |
| Minnesota state avg (all industries) | 5.18 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Micro Control Company to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 10 reportable incidents · 10 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 7 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 2 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2021: 11 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 5 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 5 | 2 | 0 |
| 2021 | 6.8 | 3.1 | 6 | 5 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Micro Control Company's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Printed circuit boards loading peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 84% of the Printed circuit boards loading benchmark, Micro Control Company reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Printed circuit boards loading sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Micro Control Company's safety grade?
How many injuries has Micro Control Company reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Minnesota, and by nearby establishments in Fridley - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~2.8)
Similar size (~177 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.