Plastic surgeons' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

Midsota Plastic Surgeons

St. Cloud, MN · ~41 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midsota Plastic Surgeons runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Plastic surgeons' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade F.

Midsota Plastic Surgeons: 9.7 TCR = 256% of Plastic surgeons' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midsota Plastic Surgeons safety composite

Midsota Plastic Surgeons scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2024

Midsota Plastic Surgeons injury rate improved

Midsota Plastic Surgeons's TCR fell 1.2 from 3.0 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 27.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.0 · 2018=27.5 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=20.3 · 2022=15.6 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · St. Cloud, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 256% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #358/419
  • PHOTO Sutter Valley Medica…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30669) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Midsota Plastic Surgeons in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midsota Plastic Surgeons averages 9.7 TCR (256% of the Plastic surgeons' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midsota Plastic Surgeons TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=27.5 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=20.3 · 2022=15.6 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Midsota Plastic Surgeons falls in its industry

2,836 Plastic surgeons' offices (e.g establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #358 safest of 419 Plastic surgeons' offices (e.g employers in Minnesota.

Midsota Plastic Surgeons (41 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Midsota Plastic Surgeons
Midsota Plastic Surgeons (41 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Midsota Plastic Surgeons has fewer employees than the Plastic surgeons' offices (e.g., centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2023 5.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 15.6 7.8 2 2 0
2021 20.3 0.0 5 0 0
2020 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.5 0.0 2 0 0
2018 27.5 0.0 9 0 0
2017 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · St. Cloud

2,836 Plastic surgeons' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 130 employers in St. Cloud, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30669) 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10177) 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2429-Shelby Surgical Associates 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allina Health Faribault Clinic 9.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Farming 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feedmill TW Shop - SE 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hobbs Brigade Energy Services 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wild Rice Electric Cooperative, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare St. Cloud Hospital 4,767 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Cloud Hospital 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Cloud State University 1,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare Health Plaza 928 FTE
NAT-TCR Mo Sci, LLC 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 084/Delaware 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Canton Racing Products 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0407 Dallas 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carson City Office 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Digestive Disease Center 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE ICCS - Greeley 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pepe Ganga Cidra 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.