Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · California

Mission Rock Lot B

San Francisco, CA · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mission Rock Lot B runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Mission Rock Lot B: 2.2 TCR = 76% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mission Rock Lot B safety composite

Mission Rock Lot B scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mission Rock Lot B: 0.0 → 6.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.6 TCR · DART/TCR 3× in 2023

Mission Rock Lot B's TCR rose 6.6 from 0.0 in 2021 to 6.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 76% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #227/486
  • PHOTO 1007 - BELFOR Anahei…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1007 - BELFOR Anaheim CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mission Rock Lot B in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mission Rock Lot B averages 2.2 TCR (76% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mission Rock Lot B TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=6.6 · BLS 2.9

Where Mission Rock Lot B falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #227 safest of 486 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

Mission Rock Lot B (66 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Mission Rock Lot B
Mission Rock Lot B (66 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Mission Rock Lot B has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.6 6.6 0 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · San Francisco

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1007 - BELFOR Anaheim CA 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Structures, Inc. Washington 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SVH HR Administration Building 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hagerman, Inc. 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nuseed Americas, Inc., West Sacramento Innovation Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORGANIC BUNCH HARVESTING 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navco Berry Harvest 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE kings orchards, llc 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Spence & Company 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Barney Davis, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Encapsys, LLC Portage Plant 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR GC9 Industrial Dr, Gold Creek Processing, LLC. 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lee's Piggly Wiggly, Inc 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE CNJ, Tech Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinecrest Elementary School 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Starling at Nocatee Independent Living 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.