Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Mitchell House

Spruce Pine, NC · ~54 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mitchell House runs at 294% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Mitchell House: 11.2 TCR = 294% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mitchell House safety composite

Mitchell House scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2016→2024

Mitchell House injury rate improved

Mitchell House's TCR fell 8.9 from 11.8 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 54.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.8 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=23.0 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=54.8 · 2021=19.8 · 2022=11.3 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Spruce Pine, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 294% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #301/356
  • PHOTO Villas of Holly Broo…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Villas of Holly Brook - Streator (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Mitchell House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mitchell House averages 11.2 TCR (294% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mitchell House TCR series: 2016=11.8 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=23 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=54.8 · 2021=19.8 · 2022=11.3 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Mitchell House falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #301 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Mitchell House (54 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mitchell House
Mitchell House (54 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Mitchell House has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 5.9 5.9 3 0 0
2022 11.3 0.0 5 0 0
2021 19.8 5.0 8 0 0
2020 54.8 52.4 2 21 0
2019 10.1 0.0 5 0 0
2018 23.0 6.3 10 1 0
2017 4.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 11.8 7.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Spruce Pine

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 9 employers in Spruce Pine, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Streator 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kennebunk 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gardens at Town Square 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Auberge at Onion Creek 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE ER LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elizabethtown 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Raleigh North 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31045 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR MH Blue Ridge Medical Center, LLLP 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2749 253 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRP US Inc. Spruce Pine 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2749 212 FTE
NAT-TCR Sierra Insulation Contractors 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Creative Community Living Services Northwestern 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Evansville Care Campus 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Button Bakery 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Durling Nursery, Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transition Plus School 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 800-DREES-INDIANAPOLIS 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Landmark Center 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.