Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

MorningStar of Littleton

Littleton, CO · ~63 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MorningStar of Littleton runs at 412% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

MorningStar of Littleton: 15.6 TCR = 412% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MorningStar of Littleton safety composite

MorningStar of Littleton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2017→2018

MorningStar of Littleton injury rate improved

MorningStar of Littleton's TCR fell 5.5 from 18.4 in 2017 to 12.9 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=18.4 · 2018=12.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Littleton, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.6 · 412% of ind

  • DART 9.7 DART
  • RANK #127/140
  • PHOTO Artis Senior Living …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Artis Senior Living of Eatontown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

MorningStar of Littleton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MorningStar of Littleton averages 15.6 TCR (412% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MorningStar of Littleton TCR series: 2017=18.4 · 2018=12.9 · BLS 3.8

Where MorningStar of Littleton falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #127 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

MorningStar of Littleton (63 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate MorningStar of Littleton
MorningStar of Littleton (63 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

MorningStar of Littleton has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 12.9 9.7 7 1 0
2017 18.4 8.3 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Littleton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 238 employers in Littleton, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Eatontown 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at The West End 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Lake Village 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Willow Towers 15.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Main Office 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakewood Electric Co Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Underground Corp. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE C&L Water Solutions, Inc- Colorado 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Waterton Campus (1004) 5,542 FTE
CITY-NEAR Littleton Adventist Hospital 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Littleton Deer Crk Cnyn (1003) 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Littleton 1,174 FTE
NAT-TCR Kamco Supply Corporation of New England 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Berwyn 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wood mill/ Recycle 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR New Albany Nursing and Rehab 15.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Regional Logistics Support Center- Austin 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deerfield (Masde) 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thief River Falls (Mnthe) 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Falls (Mtgtf) 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.