Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New Jersey

Artis Senior Living of Eatontown

Eatontown, NJ · ~43 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Artis Senior Living of Eatontown runs at 412% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Artis Senior Living of Eatontown: 15.6 TCR = 412% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Artis Senior Living of Eatontown safety composite

Artis Senior Living of Eatontown scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2022→2024

Artis Senior Living of Eatontown injury rate improved

Artis Senior Living of Eatontown's TCR fell 5.7 from 18.0 in 2022 to 12.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=18.0 · 2023=16.6 · 2024=12.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Eatontown, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.6 · 412% of ind

  • DART 12.3 DART
  • RANK #118/125
  • PHOTO MorningStar of Littl…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MorningStar of Littleton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Artis Senior Living of Eatontown in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Artis Senior Living of Eatontown averages 15.6 TCR (412% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Artis Senior Living of Eatontown TCR series: 2022=18 · 2023=16.6 · 2024=12.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Artis Senior Living of Eatontown falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #118 safest of 125 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Jersey.

Artis Senior Living of Eatontown (43 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Artis Senior Living of Eatontown
Artis Senior Living of Eatontown (43 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Artis Senior Living of Eatontown has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.3 12.3 6 0 0
2023 16.6 5.5 6 0 0
2022 18.0 18.0 0 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NJ · Eatontown

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 53 employers in Eatontown, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MorningStar of Littleton 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at The West End 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Lake Village 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Willow Towers 15.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elizabethtown Gas: New Village 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Jersey Gas: Cumberland 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Water Operations and Maintenance, LLC City of Camden 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJ Division - Freehold 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMH Hospitals Corporation 2,235 FTE
CITY-NEAR SubCom, LLC 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR West-Ward Eatontown 342 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monmouth 052 241 FTE
NAT-TCR Los Angeles - MCS 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurora 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Dynamik XP LLC 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR R.M. Wright Construction Co. 15.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Pointe Assisted Living of Mayodan 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocala Tractor LLC - Main Location 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE SouthWest Commons by New Perspective 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salida Woods by New Perspective 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.