Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · Illinois

N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC

Matteson, IL · ~138 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade C.

N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC safety composite

N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

86/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC held a steady TCR band

N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Matteson, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/81
  • PHOTO DoorDash, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DoorDash, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 81 Delivery service (except as pa employers in Illinois.

N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC (138 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC
N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC (138 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

N & M Hansbrough Logistics LLC has more employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · IL · Matteson

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 32 employers in Matteson, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DoorDash, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DTO LOGISTICS LLC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Connection Central Transport 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flash Fast Logistics LLC 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wood Dale 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jendersee, Inc. 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elk Grove IL (Small) 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC - Cornell Avenue Facility 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ORD5 2,742 FTE
CITY-NEAR MANHEIM CHICAGO 429 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8807813-Sam's DC 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6504 273 FTE
NAT-TCR Pitman Glass Company 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EPIC Tampa 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TXC101551 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Americold Logistics, LLC: Ontario Public 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creek Nation Community Hospital 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Selma Plant 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kent Oh - 3371 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.