Print shops, lithographic (offset) (except printing books) · North Carolina

NAPP Greenesboro

Name: NAPP Greenesboro Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Greensboro, NC · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 4.7
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NAPP Greenesboro runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Print shops, lithographic (offset) (except printing books) workplace, earning a grade D.

NAPP Greenesboro: 4.7 TCR = 143% of Print shops, lithographic (offset) (except printing books) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NAPP Greenesboro safety composite

NAPP Greenesboro scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers
DART rate: F 6.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

NAPP Greenesboro: 3.3 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.31× in 2017

NAPP Greenesboro's TCR rose 2.9 from 3.3 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 143% of ind

DART 6.2 DART
RANK #82/92
PHOTO Tri C Business Forms
BOOK 2y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tri C Business Forms (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

4.7
Tri C Business

4.7
GENERAL DATA C

4.7
Prographics

4.7
Mitchell Graph

4.7

What this shows NAPP Greenesboro averages 4.7 TCR (143% of the Print shops, lithographic (offset) (except printing books) BLS benchmark).

NAPP Greenesboro TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where NAPP Greenesboro falls in its industry

2,001 Print shops, lithographic (off establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 92 Print shops, lithographic (off employers in North Carolina.

NAPP Greenesboro (28 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

NAPP Greenesboro has fewer employees than the Print shops, lithographic (offset) (exce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	6.2	6.2	1	0	0
2016	3.3	3.3	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NC · Greensboro

2,001 Print shops, lithographic (offset) (except printing books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Tri C Business Forms	HOUSTON, TX	4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	GENERAL DATA COMPANY	CINTI, OH	4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Prographics	ROSEMEAD, CA	4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Mitchell Graphics	PETOSKEY, MI	4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	H & D Farms, Inc.	AUTRYVILLE	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	SMITH FARMS	YADKINVILLE	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Michael Morris Farms	AHOSKIE	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Elkin Hatchery	ELKIN	28 FTE
CITY-NEAR	MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital	Greensboro	3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Guilford County Local Government - All Employees	Greensboro	3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Guilford County Local Government	Greensboro	3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR	NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB	Greensboro	2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR	0768 - Palmdale, Ca	Palmdale, CA	4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	0188 - Saginaw, Mi	Saginaw, MI	4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Port Reading - PRD	Port Reading, NJ	4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Northwest Community Healthcare Heart & Vascular Specialists	Arlington Heights, IL	4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Arizona Production Center	Mesa, AZ	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	0773 - Enterprise, Al	Enterprise, AL	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	0445 - Murrieta, Ca	Murrieta, CA	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	0196 - Albany, Ny	Albany, NY	28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.