Armature rewinding on a factory basis · Tennessee

Nashville Motor Division

Nashville, TN · ~21 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nashville Motor Division runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Armature rewinding on a factory basis workplace, earning a grade B.

Nashville Motor Division: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Armature rewinding on a factory basis BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nashville Motor Division safety composite

Nashville Motor Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2016→2024

Nashville Motor Division injury rate improved

Nashville Motor Division's TCR fell 5.1 from 5.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335312 · Nashville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO ABB
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ABB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Nashville Motor Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nashville Motor Division averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Armature rewinding on a factory basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nashville Motor Division TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Nashville Motor Division falls in its industry

222 Armature rewinding on a factor establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Armature rewinding on a factor employers in Tennessee.

Nashville Motor Division (21 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Nashville Motor Division
Nashville Motor Division (21 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Nashville Motor Division has fewer employees than the Armature rewinding on a factory basis median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 5.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335312 · TN · Nashville

222 Armature rewinding on a factory basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,187 employers in Nashville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ABB 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tar LCC, DBA Houma Armature Works 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moog Aspen Motion Technologies, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR McCully Corporation 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE SOUTH TEXAS FARM 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenpoint Ag- Gin & Warehouse 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson Pest Control, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Obion County Growout 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parallon Enterprises, LLC 15,267 FTE
CITY-NEAR METROPOLITAN GOVT. OF NASHVILLE,& DAVIDSON COUNTY 10,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR METRO NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Centennial Medical Center 3,106 FTE
NAT-TCR Raccoon Service Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Foti Contracting LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trucare Living Centers - Columbus 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Theodore Williams Construction Company, LLC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comfort Orlando 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Drive 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rudy Krause, Construction 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.