Patient monitoring equipment (e.g., intensive care, coronary care unit) manufacturing · California

Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions

Irvine, CA · ~46 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Patient monitoring equipment (e.g., intensive care, coronary care unit) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Patient monitoring equipment (e.g., intensive care, coronary care unit) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions safety composite

Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions held a steady TCR band

Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · Irvine, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/51
  • PHOTO medtronic mounds vie…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: medtronic mounds view campus (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Patient monitoring equipment (e.g., intensive care, coronary care unit) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions falls in its industry

242 Patient monitoring equipment ( establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 51 Patient monitoring equipment ( employers in California.

Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions (46 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions
Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions (46 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Nihon Kohden Digital Health Solutions has fewer employees than the Patient monitoring equipment (e.g., inte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · CA · Irvine

242 Patient monitoring equipment (e.g., intensive care, coronary care unit) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 622 employers in Irvine, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR medtronic mounds view campus 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Headquarters 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teleflex Morrisville 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Matteoli Brothers 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMR Farms-San Miguel 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Berry Farms 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pitigliano Farm Services, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Irvine 16,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-10 4,926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Lifesciences 4,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson and Johnson MDD CSS Irvine 3,775 FTE
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amigos Meats Distributors East 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rafael Building Trades 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quikrete - Slc 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE B & C Wood Components LLC 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.