Pacemakers manufacturing · Minnesota

Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial

St. Paul, MN · ~1,029 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial runs at 3% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pacemakers manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial: 0.1 TCR = 3% of Pacemakers manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial safety composite

Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial held a steady TCR band

Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.1 in 2021 to 0.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.1 · 2022=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · St. Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 3% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #2/44
  • PHOTO Teleflex Morrisville
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~1,029 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Teleflex Morrisville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial averages 0.1 TCR (3% of the Pacemakers manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial TCR series: 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial falls in its industry

242 Pacemakers manufacturing establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 44 Pacemakers manufacturing employers in Minnesota.

Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial (1,029 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial
Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial (1,029 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Boston Scientific CRM - National Commercial has more employees than the Pacemakers manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2021 0.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · MN · St. Paul

242 Pacemakers manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 370 employers in St. Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Teleflex Morrisville 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR medtronic mounds view campus 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Headquarters 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEHC : Waukesha WI (MR), HCS 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE IWCO Chanhassen 1,028 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office-Lafayette 1,031 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Minnesota State University 1,032 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maple Grove Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR YCID 5,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific CRM 5,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Hospital 3,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR IT Campus 2,409 FTE
NAT-TCR Northeast Health Center 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PSE&G NJ Asset Management & Planning 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Growers Transplanting, Inc. - Pajaro Valley Farm 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SIE - Los Angeles 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Montgomery County Government 1,029 FTE
NAT-SIZE California Correctional Center 1,029 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pegatron 1,029 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woburn Marshalls Distribution Center 1,029 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.