Distribution of electric power · South Carolina

NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3

Jenkinsville, SC · ~80 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 safety composite

NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 held a steady TCR band

NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Jenkinsville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/86
  • PHOTO ENTERGY CORPORATE BL…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ENTERGY CORPORATE BLDG. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 86 Distribution of electric power employers in South Carolina.

NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 (80 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3
NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 (80 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · SC · Jenkinsville

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 6 employers in Jenkinsville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ENTERGY CORPORATE BLDG. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Headquarters 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 411 Headquarters 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AHOSKIE 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE WILLIAMS STEAM PLANT 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHARLESTON GAS OPERATIONS 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Charleston Sewer District 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar - Coastal Carolinas (Myrtle Beach) 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR VC Summer Station - Unit 1 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR VC SUMMER POWER STATION UNIT 1 546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Champion Specialty Services, LLC @ VC Summer Nuclear Station 480 FTE
CITY-NEAR NNOB VCSN UNITS 1 2 3 82 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Envision Printing, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wadena 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concord Health 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Waterford Community Center 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yankee Hill Village 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.