Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California
Oakmont of Chino Hills
Chino Hills, CA · ~93 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 13.6
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Oakmont of Chino Hills runs at 357% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.
Oakmont of Chino Hills: 13.6 TCR = 357% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Oakmont of Chino Hills safety composite
Oakmont of Chino Hills scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
31/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 13.57 per 100 workers
Safer than 16% of industry peers
- DART rate
- D 5.29 per 100 workers
Safer than 35% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 50% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
Rising injury rate
Oakmont of Chino Hills: 5.8 → 10.6 TCR
Peak year 2019 @ 27.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2024
Oakmont of Chino Hills's TCR rose 4.8 from 5.8 in 2017 to 10.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 27.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 623312 · Chino Hills, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade F · TCR 13.6 · 357% of ind
- DART 5.3 DART
- RANK #478/635
- PHOTO Whispering Creek Sen…
- BOOK 7y book
- INJ 54 inj
- SIZE ~93 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Whispering Creek Senior Creek (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →
Oakmont of Chino Hills in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Oakmont of Chino Hills
13.6 TCR
- Whispering Cre
Whispering Creek Senior Creek
13.6 TCR
- Guilderland
Guilderland
13.6 TCR
- KRE-BSL HUSKY
KRE-BSL HUSKY ROBBINS BROOK OPERATION LLC
13.6 TCR
- Village Concep
Village Concepts of Bothell Riverside East
13.6 TCR
What this shows Oakmont of Chino Hills averages 13.6 TCR (357% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).
Oakmont of Chino Hills TCR series: 2017=5.8 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=27.1 · 2021=20.9 · 2022=15.8 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=10.6 · BLS 3.8
Where Oakmont of Chino Hills falls in its industry
6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishmentsSafer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #478 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.
Oakmont of Chino Hills has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10.6 | 5.3 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 4.6 | 1.1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 15.8 | 13.2 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 20.9 | 20.9 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019 | 27.1 | 14.9 | 9 | 11 | 0 |
| 2018 | 10.2 | 8.8 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
623312 · CA · Chino Hills
6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 53 employers in Chino Hills, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Whispering Creek Senior Creek | 13.6 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Guilderland | 13.6 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | KRE-BSL HUSKY ROBBINS BROOK OPERATION LLC | 13.6 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Village Concepts of Bothell Riverside East | 13.6 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Mt. View Farming, Inc. | 93 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | PAC-MAN | 93 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | E A & T | 93 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Mountain Meadow Mushroom Farms, Inc. | 93 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | People's Care | 1,235 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 0473 - CHINO HILLS CA WHSE | 333 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Port logistics Building 16 | 223 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 0316 LOWE S OF CHINO HILLS CA | 133 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Town of Wilmington | 13.6 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Hagerstown MD Panel | 13.6 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Washington Veterans Home | 13.6 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Crescent Crown Distributing_Surprise | 13.6 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Trans-System Inc - Denver | 93 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | LENSAR, Inc. | 93 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Coty Of Meriden Fire Department Engine #4 | 93 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | City Of Meriden Fire Department #5 | 93 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.