Water control and quality program administration · California

O&M - Delta Field Division

Byron, CA · ~144 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

O&M - Delta Field Division runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Water control and quality program administration workplace, earning a grade D.

O&M - Delta Field Division: 4.6 TCR = 144% of Water control and quality program administration BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

O&M - Delta Field Division safety composite

O&M - Delta Field Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

O&M - Delta Field Division held a steady TCR band

O&M - Delta Field Division's TCR held near 0.0 from 4.8 in 2017 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.8 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · Byron, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 144% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #39/56
  • PHOTO Public Works
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~144 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Public Works (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

O&M - Delta Field Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows O&M - Delta Field Division averages 4.6 TCR (144% of the Water control and quality program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

O&M - Delta Field Division TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=6 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.2

Where O&M - Delta Field Division falls in its industry

131 Water control and quality prog establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 56 Water control and quality prog employers in California.

O&M - Delta Field Division (144 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate O&M - Delta Field Division
O&M - Delta Field Division (144 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

O&M - Delta Field Division has more employees than the Water control and quality program admini median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 3.2 4 2 0
2023 4.3 2.6 3 2 0
2022 3.6 1.8 4 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 0 3 0
2020 5.2 4.4 6 0 0
2019 5.3 3.5 6 0 0
2018 6.0 4.3 7 0 0
2017 4.8 0.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · CA · Byron

131 Water control and quality program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 6 employers in Byron, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Public Works 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solid Waste Landfill & Recycling 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Yuba City Waste Water Treatment Facility 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cook County Department of Environment and Sustainability 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Matsui Nursery, Inc 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilltop Ranch Inc. - Turlock Rd. 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAGO'S CONTRACTING 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 1230 3RD 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Underground Contractor 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR SLDMWA TFO 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marin Food Specialties Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR 051080-BYRON PO 29 FTE
NAT-TCR Pomp's Tire - Bridgeton 117 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR East Paint 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Barrday Composite Solutions 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Children's Hospital-The Woodlands 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Decimal Engineering 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Houston 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE MBA Building Supplies, Inc 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medical Components, Inc. 144 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.