Motor freight carrier, general, local · California

Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson

Carson, CA · ~56 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson runs at 185% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, local workplace, earning a grade D.

Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson: 8.3 TCR = 185% of Motor freight carrier, general, local BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson safety composite

Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

10/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson: 0.0 → 16.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 16.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.72× in 2021

Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson's TCR rose 16.6 from 0.0 in 2020 to 16.6 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Carson, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.3 · 185% of ind

  • DART 14.3 DART
  • RANK #210/264
  • PHOTO Mondelez Global - We…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mondelez Global - West Chester DSD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson averages 8.3 TCR (185% of the Motor freight carrier, general, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=16.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson falls in its industry

2,784 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #210 safest of 264 Motor freight carrier, general employers in California.

Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson (56 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson
Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson (56 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Pacific Coast Container, Inc. - Carson has more employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, local median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 16.6 14.3 2 5 1
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · CA · Carson

2,784 Motor freight carrier, general, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 236 employers in Carson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mondelez Global - West Chester DSD 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DCC : 5571-00 Kubota KTC-DCC/Jefferson, GA 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MALLARE ENTERPRISES, INC 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ward Trucking LLC-Milton 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wallace Brothers 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sun Farms, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperhill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Refinery Carson 1,083 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMPAM Parks Mechanical 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Carson 755 FTE
NAT-TCR HOU - Maintenance 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Curry Rail Services 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Schmidt Baking Company 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BHA 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clarksburg 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jewell an Oldcastle Company (hurst) 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mablevale 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Distribution Center 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.