Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Maryland

Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC

Rockville, MD · ~68 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC runs at 264% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC: 10.0 TCR = 264% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC safety composite

Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.4

2022→2024

Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC injury rate improved

Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC's TCR fell 10.4 from 17.3 in 2022 to 6.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=17.3 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=6.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Rockville, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 264% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #59/79
  • PHOTO Aegis of Carmichael
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aegis of Carmichael (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC averages 10.0 TCR (264% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC TCR series: 2022=17.3 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=6.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 79 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maryland.

Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC (68 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC
Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC (68 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Tuckerman Assisted Living LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.9 2.3 3 0 0
2023 5.8 5.8 3 0 0
2022 17.3 13.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MD · Rockville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 225 employers in Rockville, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Carmichael 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wickshire South Lee Buford 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10071 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10293 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pumphrey Training Center 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Humphrey Rich Construction Group, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gradeline Construction Company, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE JES Baltimore 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist Health Shady Grove Medical Center 2,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Medical Center 2,461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shady Grove Adventist Hospital 2,357 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOM's Organic Market 1,354 FTE
NAT-TCR Unn 1 & 2 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rgv Delivers 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Panther Creek Power Operating 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 8618 Pittson Rlc 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Acousti Engineering Raleigh 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE SB Distribution LLC 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE MI022 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dunamis Coalition 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.