Community recreation programs, government · Illinois

Park Ridge Park District

Park Ridge, IL · ~421 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Park Ridge Park District runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Community recreation programs, government workplace, earning a grade D.

Park Ridge Park District: 5.7 TCR = 177% of Community recreation programs, government BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Park Ridge Park District safety composite

Park Ridge Park District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2017→2024

Park Ridge Park District injury rate improved

Park Ridge Park District's TCR fell 5.5 from 9.4 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.4 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Park Ridge, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 177% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #36/63
  • PHOTO City of Phoenix 001 …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~421 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Phoenix 001 PR PT EEs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Park Ridge Park District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Park Ridge Park District averages 5.7 TCR (177% of the Community recreation programs, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Park Ridge Park District TCR series: 2017=9.4 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.2

Where Park Ridge Park District falls in its industry

413 Community recreation programs, establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 63 Community recreation programs, employers in Illinois.

Park Ridge Park District (421 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Park Ridge Park District
Park Ridge Park District (421 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Park Ridge Park District has more employees than the Community recreation programs, governmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 1.1 7 0 0
2023 7.2 4.8 12 0 0
2022 6.2 0.0 7 2 0
2021 3.4 0.0 3 2 0
2020 4.1 2.0 4 0 0
2019 6.5 2.7 12 0 0
2018 4.6 3.5 8 1 0
2017 9.4 4.2 16 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · IL · Park Ridge

413 Community recreation programs, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 35 employers in Park Ridge, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Phoenix 001 PR PT EEs 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSY Construction 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ogden City - Parks 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bartlett Park District 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE ARBOR - CANTON UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 66 421 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pekin Hospital 420 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lutheran Home 422 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fervalue 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advocate Lutheran General Hospital 4,306 FTE
CITY-NEAR TheKey - IL, Park Ridge (1300 W Higgins Road) 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spark Therapy, LLC 309 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAINE EAST HIGH SCHOOL 295 FTE
NAT-TCR Ocean Breeze International 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Casa Bonita Convalescent Hospital 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Renova Energy corp. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ME Global - Duluth 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Division 3 421 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3D Systems - Waterford 421 FTE
NAT-SIZE J Marchini Farms 421 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mondi 421 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.