Membership associations, civic or social · Virginia

Patrick Henry Family YMCA

Ashland, VA · ~105 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Patrick Henry Family YMCA runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Membership associations, civic or social workplace, earning a grade D.

Patrick Henry Family YMCA: 2.8 TCR = 133% of Membership associations, civic or social BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Patrick Henry Family YMCA safety composite

Patrick Henry Family YMCA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2023

Patrick Henry Family YMCA injury rate improved

Patrick Henry Family YMCA's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.9 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813410 · Ashland, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.8 · 133% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #5/19
  • PHOTO Reuter Family YMCA
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reuter Family YMCA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Patrick Henry Family YMCA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Patrick Henry Family YMCA averages 2.8 TCR (133% of the Membership associations, civic or social BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Patrick Henry Family YMCA TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=3.8 · BLS 2.1

Where Patrick Henry Family YMCA falls in its industry

298 Membership associations, civic establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 19 Membership associations, civic employers in Virginia.

Patrick Henry Family YMCA (105 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Patrick Henry Family YMCA
Patrick Henry Family YMCA (105 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Patrick Henry Family YMCA has more employees than the Membership associations, civic or social median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2022 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813410 · VA · Ashland

298 Membership associations, civic or social employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 134 employers in Ashland, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reuter Family YMCA 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwest Family YMCA 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Longwood YMCA 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryan Family YMCA 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE S.W. Funk Industrial Contractors Inc. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Branch Builds, Inc. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2900 BCD 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electrical Service 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : RIC5 1,187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RIC5 1,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1730 RNDC-ASHLAND 486 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4609-1730 468 FTE
NAT-TCR Nickolas M Savko & Sons 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mitchell 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Symrise - Elyria 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Barnes Aerospace Lansing Division 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hansen Manufacturing Corp d/b/a Hi Roller Conveyors 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alsuma Mtr and Substation 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omix-ADA 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Times Supermarket Kahala 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.