Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Minnesota

PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis

Burnsville, MN · ~170 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis: 3.0 TCR = 104% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis safety composite

PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2017

PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis injury rate improved

PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis's TCR fell 1.3 from 3.7 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.7 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Burnsville, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 104% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #62/130
  • PHOTO Main Office
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~170 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Main Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis averages 3.0 TCR (104% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=2.4 · BLS 2.9

Where PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 130 Construction management, comme employers in Minnesota.

PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis (170 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis
PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis (170 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

PCL Construction Services, Inc. Minneapolis has more employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.4 0.4 6 0 0
2016 3.7 2.1 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MN · Burnsville

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 243 employers in Burnsville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Main Office 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CEF CT 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR James E. Fitzgerald, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DIVCON, Inc. 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brill Eagan 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lunds & Byerlys, Mitchell Road 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highland Manufacturing 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE PLANT 9 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ames Construction 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosemount Aerospace Inc (Burnsville MN) 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE INC_6830 1,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodrich - Sensors and Integrated Systems- Burnsville MN 1,673 FTE
NAT-TCR M&S Steel, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR M.A. Energy Resources, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Legends - OUE Skyspace 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Action Resources - McAlester 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arlington (Txarl) 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Erie (Paeri) 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orange (Ctora) 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Park - Yarn 170 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.