Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Pear Valley Senior Living

Name: Pear Valley Senior Living Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Central Point, OR · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.4
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pear Valley Senior Living runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Pear Valley Senior Living: 3.4 TCR = 89% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pear Valley Senior Living safety composite

Pear Valley Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers
DART rate: F 6.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pear Valley Senior Living: 0.0 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2021

Pear Valley Senior Living's TCR rose 6.7 from 0.0 in 2018 to 6.7 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Central Point, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 89% of ind

DART 6.7 DART
RANK #24/218
PHOTO The Waterford at Bay…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 3 inj
SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Waterford at Baytown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.4
The Waterford

3.4
PSL-Bridgewood

3.4
Villages of St

3.4
Heritage House

3.4

What this shows Pear Valley Senior Living averages 3.4 TCR (89% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Pear Valley Senior Living TCR series: 2018=0 · 2021=6.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Pear Valley Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Pear Valley Senior Living (28 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Pear Valley Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2021	6.7	6.7	3	0	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Central Point

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 63 employers in Central Point, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	The Waterford at Baytown	BAYTOWN, TX	3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	PSL-Bridgewood Gardens	ALBERTVILLE, AL	3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Villages of St Peters Memory Care	ST PETERS, MO	3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Heritage House of Portage	PORTAGE, WI	3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Forest Hills Farms, Inc.	CORNELIUS	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	TUCKER MAIER ORCHARDS LLC	THE DALLES	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	A-1 Logging, Inc.	YAMHILL	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Cedar Creek Quarries, Inc	NEWPORT	28 FTE
CITY-NEAR	1287 - CENTRAL POINT OR WHSE	Central Point	337 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Willow Springs Complex	Central Point	193 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Combined Transport	Central Point	182 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cardmoore	Central Point	180 FTE
NAT-TCR	Athens Plant	Athens, GA	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Mullins Cheese	Mosinee, WI	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Cerro Wire - Crothersville	Crothersville, IN	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Greenville Sequencing Center	Piedmont, SC	3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Volkswagen of Duluth	Hermantown, MN	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Spancrete - Sebring	Sebring, FL	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Linden Terminal / EIN 30-0854003	Linden, NJ	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Ray Roofing & Supply, Inc.	Canton, OH	28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.