Housing · Minnesota
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites
St. Paul, MN · ~81 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.1
- Avg TCR
- 3.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Housing workplace, earning a grade A.
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Housing BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites safety composite
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
73/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- B 1.08 per 100 workers
Safer than 85% of industry peers
- DART rate
- B 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 75% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites held a steady TCR band
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2019=0.0 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 925110 · St. Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL
Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind
- DART 0.0 DART
- RANK #3/11
- PHOTO Housing and Communit…
- BOOK 5y book
- INJ 3 inj
- SIZE ~81 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Housing and Community Development (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- Fresno D.A.R.M
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division
1.3 TCR
- City of Greens
City of Greensboro Planning Department
1.2 TCR
- This site
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites
1.1 TCR
- Housing and Co
Housing and Community Development
1.1 TCR
- HCIDLA Garland
HCIDLA Garland Bldg.
1.1 TCR
What this shows PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Housing BLS benchmark).
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.2
Where PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites falls in its industry
54 Housing establishmentsSafer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 11 Housing employers in Minnesota.
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites has more employees than the Housing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
925110 · MN · St. Paul
54 Housing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 370 employers in St. Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Housing and Community Development | 1.1 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | HCIDLA Garland Bldg. | 1.1 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | City of Greensboro Planning Department | 1.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Fresno D.A.R.M. Division | 1.3 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Edgewood Blaine | 81 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | 6458-ZMNK | 81 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | City of Edina - Police Department | 81 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Central McGowan | 81 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | YCID | 5,214 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Boston Scientific CRM | 5,100 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | United Hospital | 3,384 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | IT Campus | 2,409 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Altus Industries II Inc | 1.1 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Stillwater Milling Davis | 1.1 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Worley Field Services at Mosaic Baton Rouge Operations | 1.1 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Fayetteville Pdca | 1.1 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Lincoln, AL | 81 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (MCH-6487) | 81 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Good Food Inc. | 81 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Denali Construction Services, LLC | 81 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.