Air passenger carriers, scheduled · Arizona

Phoenix Alaska Reservations

Chandler, AZ · ~277 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phoenix Alaska Reservations runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air passenger carriers, scheduled workplace, earning a grade A.

Phoenix Alaska Reservations: 0.4 TCR = 10% of Air passenger carriers, scheduled BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phoenix Alaska Reservations safety composite

Phoenix Alaska Reservations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Phoenix Alaska Reservations held a steady TCR band

Phoenix Alaska Reservations's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Chandler, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #3/54
  • PHOTO Contour Aviation Hea…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~277 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Contour Aviation Headquarters (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Phoenix Alaska Reservations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phoenix Alaska Reservations averages 0.4 TCR (10% of the Air passenger carriers, scheduled BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phoenix Alaska Reservations TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Phoenix Alaska Reservations falls in its industry

1,568 Air passenger carriers, schedu establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 54 Air passenger carriers, schedu employers in Arizona.

Phoenix Alaska Reservations (277 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Phoenix Alaska Reservations
Phoenix Alaska Reservations (277 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Phoenix Alaska Reservations has more employees than the Air passenger carriers, scheduled median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2023 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2022 1.1 0.3 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 0.9 0.5 1 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · AZ · Chandler

1,568 Air passenger carriers, scheduled employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 462 employers in Chandler, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Contour Aviation Headquarters 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9006-90060006 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-DFW-DALLAS FORT WORTH-DFW-EVHE 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1004-69 GoJet EWR Flight Operations 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Casa Grande Price Industries 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0400 GEODIS LOGISTICS 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chamberlain Group Inc (Tucson TSC) 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0401 AZ CTS Phoenix 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chandler Campus 6,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocotillo Campus 5,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030510 3,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030510-510001 2,446 FTE
NAT-TCR TCCo-TN 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR HydroAire Services 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydro South 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pritchard Industries Southwest, LLC. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbia Gear 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Packaging Corp 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chapel Electric Co., LLC 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #4036 277 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.