Surgical supplies (except medical instruments) manufacturing · Connecticut

Cirtec Medical

Enfield, CT · ~125 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cirtec Medical runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Surgical supplies (except medical instruments) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Cirtec Medical: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Surgical supplies (except medical instruments) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cirtec Medical safety composite

Cirtec Medical scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

Cirtec Medical injury rate improved

Cirtec Medical's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · Enfield, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/11
  • PHOTO Musculoskeletal Tran…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation -Olyphant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Cirtec Medical in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cirtec Medical averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Surgical supplies (except medical instruments) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cirtec Medical TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Cirtec Medical falls in its industry

555 Surgical supplies (except medi establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 11 Surgical supplies (except medi employers in Connecticut.

Cirtec Medical (125 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Cirtec Medical
Cirtec Medical (125 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Cirtec Medical has more employees than the Surgical supplies (except medical instru median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.9 1.0 3 0 0
2020 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2016 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · CT · Enfield

555 Surgical supplies (except medical instruments) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 106 employers in Enfield, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation -Olyphant 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Micro Precision Swiss LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pierceton - Instruments & Implants 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belleville 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Saputo Dairy Foods, USA 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Standard Plant Group 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building 1 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0593 LOWE S OF NEW HAVEN CT 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC 41 - Hartford 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation 442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Auto Parts DC 41 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12131 346 FTE
NAT-TCR Kluber Lubrication NA LP (NH1) 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield ReManufacturing Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Concord Marketing Services 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Defender's Office 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fond du Lac Container 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Masonic Villages at Warminster 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Essex 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sarasota Bay Club 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.