Meat canning, poultry (except baby and pet food), manufacturing · Utah

Pitman Farms, Utah Division

Moroni, UT · ~474 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pitman Farms, Utah Division runs at 329% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Meat canning, poultry (except baby and pet food), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Pitman Farms, Utah Division: 10.8 TCR = 329% of Meat canning, poultry (except baby and pet food), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pitman Farms, Utah Division safety composite

Pitman Farms, Utah Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pitman Farms, Utah Division: 7.4 → 7.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 16.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.4× in 2022

Pitman Farms, Utah Division's TCR rose 0.4 from 7.4 in 2019 to 7.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Moroni, UT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 329% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO John F. Martin & Son…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 269 inj
  • SIZE ~474 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: John F. Martin & Sons, LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Pitman Farms, Utah Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pitman Farms, Utah Division averages 10.8 TCR (329% of the Meat canning, poultry (except baby and pet food), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pitman Farms, Utah Division TCR series: 2019=7.4 · 2020=16.2 · 2021=12 · 2022=7.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Pitman Farms, Utah Division falls in its industry

509 Meat canning, poultry (except establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Meat canning, poultry (except employers in Utah.

Pitman Farms, Utah Division (474 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pitman Farms, Utah Division
Pitman Farms, Utah Division (474 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Pitman Farms, Utah Division has fewer employees than the Meat canning, poultry (except baby and p median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.8 4.3 48 1 0
2021 12.0 7.9 59 3 0
2020 16.2 9.8 86 3 0
2019 7.4 4.5 76 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · UT · Moroni

509 Meat canning, poultry (except baby and pet food), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 5 employers in Moroni, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR John F. Martin & Sons, LLC 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilkesboro Food Service Plant 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amick Farms, LLC MS Processing Plant 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glen Allen Plant 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE YLEO Distribution Centers 474 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stryker Salt Lake City 474 FTE
STATE-SIZE GEHC : Logan UT, LS 473 FTE
STATE-SIZE SnugZ USA, LLC 476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pitman Farms, Moroni Turkey Processing 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pitman Farms Utah, Live Production 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR QSI Norbest Moroni 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR QSI Moroni 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Sysco Albany, LLC 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NorCal RotoCo Modesto 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-04601 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Charles C Parks Company 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. 474 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cincinnati Manufacturing Facility 474 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Noblesville 474 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shepherd Parkway Bus Facility 474 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.