NURSING CARE FACILITIES (SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES) · South Carolina

Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills

Seneca, SC · ~86 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical NURSING CARE FACILITIES (SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES) workplace, earning a grade B.

Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills: 3.6 TCR = 56% of NURSING CARE FACILITIES (SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills safety composite

Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills held a steady TCR band

Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills's TCR held near 0.0 from 3.6 in 2022 to 3.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.6 · 2023=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Seneca, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 56% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #44/165
  • PHOTO Arroyo Vista Nursing…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arroyo Vista Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills averages 3.6 TCR (56% of the NURSING CARE FACILITIES (SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills TCR series: 2022=3.6 · 2023=3.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills falls in its industry

15,252 NURSING CARE FACILITIES (SKILL establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 165 NURSING CARE FACILITIES (SKILL employers in South Carolina.

Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills (86 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills
Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills (86 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Prisma Health Hospice of the Foothills has fewer employees than the NURSING CARE FACILITIES (SKILLED NURSING median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · SC · Seneca

15,252 NURSING CARE FACILITIES (SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 59 employers in Seneca, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arroyo Vista Nursing Center 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Savoy at Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rawlins House 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanover Nursing Management LLC 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Laurel Baye Healthcare of Blackville 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Ridge in Georgetown LLC 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE OAKBROOK_1375744 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1121 NORTH MYRTLE BEACH 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oconee Nuclear 1,213 FTE
CITY-NEAR BorgWarner, Seneca 946 FTE
CITY-NEAR OCONEE MEDICAL CAMPUS 911 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schneider Electric 555 FTE
NAT-TCR Laney Electrical Construction, Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hanover Nursing Management LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ITW Trans Tech 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aeroforge, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gouverneur #37 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canby Distribution Center 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakwood Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Oakwood Manor 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Aluminum Extrusion (Canton OH) 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.