Glass fiber, optical, made in glass making plants · North Carolina

Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant

Claremont, NC · ~373 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Glass fiber, optical, made in glass making plants workplace, earning a grade B.

Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant: 2.2 TCR = 68% of Glass fiber, optical, made in glass making plants BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant safety composite

Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2022→2023

Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant injury rate improved

Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant's TCR fell 1.2 from 2.8 in 2022 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.8 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327212 · Claremont, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 68% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO SCHOTT Pharma USA Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~373 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCHOTT Pharma USA Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant averages 2.2 TCR (68% of the Glass fiber, optical, made in glass making plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant TCR series: 2022=2.8 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant falls in its industry

75 Glass fiber, optical, made in establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Glass fiber, optical, made in employers in North Carolina.

Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant (373 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant
Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant (373 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Prysmian Group Claremont Fiber Plant has more employees than the Glass fiber, optical, made in glass maki median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 1.6 6 0 0
2022 2.8 2.3 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327212 · NC · Claremont

75 Glass fiber, optical, made in glass making plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 28 employers in Claremont, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCHOTT Pharma USA Inc 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corning Incorporated Canton Plant 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GILLINDER BROTHERS, INC. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manufacturing Plant - Corning 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2510 Conover Folding 373 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Imagine Group 373 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kaba Ilco Corporation 373 FTE
STATE-SIZE Craftmaster Furniture, Inc. 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Claremont Plant 858 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hickory DC & HUB / Sutter East - Claremont 751 FTE
CITY-NEAR CommScope Claremont Facility 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR Claremont 672 FTE
NAT-TCR Mi Cocina - 18352 Dallas Pkwy, Dallas 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD# 834-Brookview Elementary 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Casey-Fogli Concrete Contractors, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Chevrolet of Wasilla 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 373 FTE
NAT-SIZE GHSP - Grand Haven 373 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jc Lara Contractor Inc. 373 FTE
NAT-SIZE Market Basket #73 373 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.