Physical rehabilitation hospitals · Tennessee

Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital

Johnson City, TN · ~125 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Physical rehabilitation hospitals workplace, earning a grade D.

Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital: 4.6 TCR = 122% of Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital safety composite

Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.19× in 2024

Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Johnson City, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 122% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #19/41
  • PHOTO Noland Hospital Tusc…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Noland Hospital Tuscaloosa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital averages 4.6 TCR (122% of the Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=8 · 2023=8.4 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital falls in its industry

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospit establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 41 Physical rehabilitation hospit employers in Tennessee.

Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital (125 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital
Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital (125 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital has fewer employees than the Physical rehabilitation hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 0.9 3 1 0
2023 8.4 6.3 8 0 0
2022 8.0 6.9 5 2 0
2021 8.3 5.9 6 1 0
2020 7.1 5.9 4 2 0
2019 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2018 3.7 1.2 3 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · TN · Johnson City

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 177 employers in Johnson City, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Noland Hospital Tuscaloosa 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2253-H7801 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ascension Wisconsin Hospital Greenfield Campus 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE VANHOOSECO MANAGEMENT LLC 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Electrical Inc 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Bakeries, Music City 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hormann LLC - Sparta, TN 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR East Tennessee State University 4,802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson City Medical Center 2,099 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ballad Health 1,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mountain States Health Alliance 1,033 FTE
NAT-TCR SECO Energy - Groveland 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Headquarters 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Schutt Industries 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1021 - BELFOR Springfield OR 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coke Northeast - Portland 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE 220-Washington DC 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Field Operations Center 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grain Millers Inc 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.