Electric power transmission systems · Mississippi

Field Operations Center

Hattiesburg, MS · ~125 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Field Operations Center runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power transmission systems workplace, earning a grade C.

Field Operations Center: 1.4 TCR = 113% of Electric power transmission systems BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Field Operations Center safety composite

Field Operations Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Field Operations Center: 0.0 → 0.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Field Operations Center's TCR rose 0.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221121 · Hattiesburg, MS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 1.4 · 113% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO CALINC SERVICES, INC.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CALINC SERVICES, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Field Operations Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Field Operations Center averages 1.4 TCR (113% of the Electric power transmission systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Field Operations Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=2 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Field Operations Center falls in its industry

263 Electric power transmission sy establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Electric power transmission sy employers in Mississippi.

Field Operations Center (125 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Field Operations Center
Field Operations Center (125 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Field Operations Center has more employees than the Electric power transmission systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 0 1 0
2023 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.7 2.8 2 2 0
2019 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2018 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2017 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221121 · MS · Hattiesburg

263 Electric power transmission systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 186 employers in Hattiesburg, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CALINC SERVICES, INC. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-Blythe S/C 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waco - Southern District 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salem Operations Center 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 8778/4631-Moss Point Fabrication 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wis-Pak of Hattiesburg, LLC 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silver Creek 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS010 Bay Springs Sawmill 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR HATTIESBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hattiesburg 4,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Processing Plant 1,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant 1,163 FTE
NAT-TCR ROCKFORD 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tenaska Virginia Generating Station 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arkansas Location 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Russell Hinton Co. 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coke Northeast - Portland 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quillen Rehabilitation Hospital 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE 220-Washington DC 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grain Millers Inc 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.