Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · New Jersey

Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md

Pilesgrove, NJ · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md: 1.3 TCR = 46% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md safety composite

Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md: 0.0 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.01× in 2023

Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.0 in 2022 to 2.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Pilesgrove, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 46% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #12/73
  • PHOTO Axis Contracting, Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Axis Contracting, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md averages 1.3 TCR (46% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=2.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 73 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in New Jersey.

Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md (43 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md
Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md (43 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Richard E. Pierson Construction - Md has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · NJ · Pilesgrove

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 7 employers in Pilesgrove, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Axis Contracting, Inc 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Halmar International 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JH Lynch & Sons Inc - Millbury 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Branch 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elizabethtown Gas: New Village 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Jersey Gas: Cumberland 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Water Operations and Maintenance, LLC City of Camden 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJ Division - Freehold 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR R.E. PIERSON CONSTRUCTION - NJ 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR RICHARD E. PIERSON CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR RICHARD E. PIERSON CONSTRUCTION - DE 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR R.E. PIERSON CONSTRUCTION - PA 161 FTE
NAT-TCR Champion Charter Sales & Service 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Danfoss 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Memorial Health System Sistersville Campus 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tsurumi America, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Feed Processing Unit (Athens) 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yankee Hill Machine 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.