Pipeline terminal facilities, independently operated · Texas

Rio Grande LNG

Name: Rio Grande LNG Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Port Isabel, TX · ~508 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.2
Avg TCR: 4.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rio Grande LNG runs at 5% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipeline terminal facilities, independently operated workplace, earning a grade A.

Rio Grande LNG: 0.2 TCR = 5% of Pipeline terminal facilities, independently operated BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rio Grande LNG safety composite

Rio Grande LNG scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rio Grande LNG: 0.0 → 0.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 0.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.48× in 2024

Rio Grande LNG's TCR rose 0.5 from 0.0 in 2023 to 0.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488999 · Port Isabel, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 5% of ind

DART 0.1 DART
RANK #1/4
PHOTO Cameron LNG
BOOK 2y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~508 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cameron LNG (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Historic Tours

0.4
Howard Midstre

0.4
Cedar Rapids R

0.3
This site

0.2
Cameron LNG

0.1

What this shows Rio Grande LNG averages 0.2 TCR (5% of the Pipeline terminal facilities, independently operated BLS benchmark).

Rio Grande LNG TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Rio Grande LNG falls in its industry

37 Pipeline terminal facilities, establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Pipeline terminal facilities, employers in Texas.

Rio Grande LNG (508 employees, TCR 0.2) among 26 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Rio Grande LNG has more employees than the Pipeline terminal facilities, independen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2024	0.5	0.1	4	0	0
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488999 · TX · Port Isabel

37 Pipeline terminal facilities, independently operated employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 4 employers in Port Isabel, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Cameron LNG	HACKBERRY, LA	0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cedar Rapids Railcar Repair	CEDAR RAPIDS, IA	0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Historic Tours of America, Inc. - Corporate	KEY WEST, FL	0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Howard Midstream Energy Partners	SAN ANTONIO, TX	0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	JFSNA at ExxonMobil Baytown Complex	BAYTOWN	508 FTE
STATE-SIZE	BuzzBallz	CARROLLTON	508 FTE
STATE-SIZE	TX312 Camden Plywood	CAMDEN	508 FTE
STATE-SIZE	SPMOG - Fort Worth	FORT WORTH	508 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 413	Port Isabel	228 FTE
CITY-NEAR	413	Port Isabel	220 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Texas Pack, Inc.	Port Isabel	129 FTE
NAT-TCR	Gageo - Atlanta General Office	Atlanta, GA	0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Krystal Biotech, Inc.	Pittsburgh, PA	0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC.	Baton Rouge, LA	0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	United Therapeutics Corporation- RTP	Rtp, NC	0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Mabro - Brockton	Brockton, MA	508 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Kalkaska Memorial Health Center	Kalkaska, MI	508 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Salm Partners	Denmark, WI	508 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Nikon Precision, Inc.	Belmont, CA	508 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.