Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding · California

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414)

San Jose, CA · ~311 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414) runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding workplace, earning a grade D.

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414): 5.6 TCR = 148% of Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414) safety composite

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2019→2021

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414) injury rate improved

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414)'s TCR fell 4.3 from 7.8 in 2019 to 3.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=7.8 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 148% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #16/36
  • PHOTO Surgecenter of Louis…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~311 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Surgecenter of Louisville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414) averages 5.6 TCR (148% of the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414) TCR series: 2019=7.8 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=3.6 · BLS 3.8

Where SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414) falls in its industry

498 Ambulatory surgical centers an establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 36 Ambulatory surgical centers an employers in California.

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414) (311 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414)
SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414) (311 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (414) has more employees than the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.6 0.6 12 0 0
2020 5.5 1.7 16 0 0
2019 7.8 2.3 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · CA · San Jose

498 Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Surgecenter of Louisville 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inova Loudoun Ambulatory Surgery Center 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blessing Surgery Center 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Three Rivers Surgical Care 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction 311 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valdez Painting, Inc. 311 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2636-CALIFORNIA.OFFSITE NON-BAY AREA 311 FTE
STATE-SIZE Element Biosciences 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Asphalt Paving Overhead 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Amherst Adult Detention Center 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Airquip INC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheridan Manor 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Minneapolis 311 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC 311 FTE
NAT-SIZE VA-Portsmouth 311 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utilities 311 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.