Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · North Carolina

SDO - Durham (former-Henderson)

Durham, NC · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SDO - Durham (former-Henderson) runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

SDO - Durham (former-Henderson): 2.7 TCR = 42% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SDO - Durham (former-Henderson) safety composite

SDO - Durham (former-Henderson) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 4.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SDO - Durham (former-Henderson) held a steady TCR band

SDO - Durham (former-Henderson)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 4.1 in 2018 to 4.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Durham, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.7 · 42% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #15/214
  • PHOTO BUFFALO, NY
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BUFFALO, NY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

SDO - Durham (former-Henderson) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SDO - Durham (former-Henderson) averages 2.7 TCR (42% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SDO - Durham (former-Henderson) TCR series: 2018=4.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.1 · BLS 6.5

Where SDO - Durham (former-Henderson) falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 214 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in North Carolina.

SDO - Durham (former-Henderson) (34 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate SDO - Durham (former-Henderson)
SDO - Durham (former-Henderson) (34 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

SDO - Durham (former-Henderson) has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.1 4.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NC · Durham

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BUFFALO, NY 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 767120000 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PIKEVILLE (KYPIK) 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 737 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2778 NC 50 South, Benson, NC 27504 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frontier Natural Gas 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iredell Operations Center 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR NAPA Auto Parts Altoona 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Louis Cold Drawn, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Point Elementary 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashley Furniture Homestore- Cordova 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paleo Solutions 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bayfront Steam Plant 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dutch Creek Foods 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bakery Nouveau - Capital Hill 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.