Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing · North Carolina

Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~166 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte: 3.3 TCR = 98% of Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte safety composite

Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2020→2021

Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte injury rate improved

Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte's TCR fell 1.7 from 4.1 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.1 · 2021=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337910 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 98% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #7/12
  • PHOTO Southerland, Oklahom…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southerland, Oklahoma Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte averages 3.3 TCR (98% of the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte TCR series: 2020=4.1 · 2021=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte falls in its industry

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 12 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, employers in North Carolina.

Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte (166 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte
Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte (166 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Serta Simmons Bedding Charlotte has more employees than the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innersprin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.4 2.4 4 0 0
2020 4.1 4.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337910 · NC · Charlotte

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southerland, Oklahoma Plant 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt. Top - PA 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Serta Simmons Bedding 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Future Foam Archdale Plant #18 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Carolina Operations, LLC 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belews Creek Steam Station 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Asheville Water Department 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midrex Technologies 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Bender Plumbing of Hartford, LLC 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sonesta ES Suites Parsippany 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Merrimack College-Cafeteria 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Strack and Van Til Corporate Office 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indus Road & Bridge 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44221d - South Dc 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE 401 Collins 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashland Place Health & Rehabilitation, LLC 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.