Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · Pennsylvania

Seventy Six Logistics

Souderton, PA · ~67 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
30.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seventy Six Logistics runs at 684% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade F.

Seventy Six Logistics: 30.8 TCR = 684% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seventy Six Logistics safety composite

Seventy Six Logistics scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 1% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

0/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 30.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 33.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Seventy Six Logistics: 10.3 → 38.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 46.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2024

Seventy Six Logistics's TCR rose 28.4 from 10.3 in 2021 to 38.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 46.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Souderton, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 30.8 · 684% of ind

  • DART 33.5 DART
  • RANK #54/54
  • PHOTO 6458-ZPOR
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 76 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6458-ZPOR (0.9 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Seventy Six Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seventy Six Logistics averages 30.8 TCR (684% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Seventy Six Logistics TCR series: 2021=10.3 · 2022=46.1 · 2023=28 · 2024=38.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Seventy Six Logistics falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 54 Delivery service (except as pa employers in Pennsylvania.

Seventy Six Logistics (67 employees, TCR 30.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Seventy Six Logistics
Seventy Six Logistics (67 employees, TCR 30.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Seventy Six Logistics has fewer employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 38.6 33.5 15 0 0
2023 28.0 25.2 20 0 0
2022 46.1 44.9 36 0 1
2021 10.3 10.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · PA · Souderton

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 69 employers in Souderton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZPOR 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMART SOLUTIONS AND LOGISTICS LLC AT DWS4 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZVEN 29.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TPLO Corp. 29.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 10338 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE City Maintenance Services Co LLC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dreamsonwheelz LLC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE BII PA Mount Joy 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR JBS Souderton INC 1,402 FTE
CITY-NEAR Almac Clinical Services LLC 764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Almac Clinical Technologies LLC 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leidy's Inc. 297 FTE
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beer Middle Schools 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Ambulance Service, Inc. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE BASF Corporation 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willow Woods Elementary School 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.