Alcoholism and drug addiction self-help organizations · California

SF - 150 Executive Park, SF

San Francisco, CA · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SF - 150 Executive Park, SF runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Alcoholism and drug addiction self-help organizations workplace, earning a grade D.

SF - 150 Executive Park, SF: 6.6 TCR = 175% of Alcoholism and drug addiction self-help organizations BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SF - 150 Executive Park, SF safety composite

SF - 150 Executive Park, SF scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SF - 150 Executive Park, SF: 3.3 → 7.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 25.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

SF - 150 Executive Park, SF's TCR rose 4.4 from 3.3 in 2018 to 7.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 25.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 175% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #156/184
  • PHOTO Goodwill Southern Ca…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodwill Southern California (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

SF - 150 Executive Park, SF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SF - 150 Executive Park, SF averages 6.6 TCR (175% of the Alcoholism and drug addiction self-help organizations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SF - 150 Executive Park, SF TCR series: 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=25.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 3.8

Where SF - 150 Executive Park, SF falls in its industry

990 Alcoholism and drug addiction establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #156 safest of 184 Alcoholism and drug addiction employers in California.

SF - 150 Executive Park, SF (32 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SF - 150 Executive Park, SF
SF - 150 Executive Park, SF (32 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

SF - 150 Executive Park, SF has fewer employees than the Alcoholism and drug addiction self-help median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 0.0 2 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 25.7 25.7 1 5 0
2019 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.3 0.0 1 0 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · CA · San Francisco

990 Alcoholism and drug addiction self-help organizations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Southern California 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HUGO HEALTHY START/CACFP 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain Projects, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchor Care Services, Southern Maine 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Van Metre Investment Properties 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydro-Technologies, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Palmettos of Mauldin 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Horton, Inc Britton 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cooper Fire Protection Services 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dunkrik Metal Products of WNY, 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mt. Hood Management 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston LaPorte CGI 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.