Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Pennsylvania

Shawville Generating Station

Shawville, PA · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shawville Generating Station runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Shawville Generating Station: 1.9 TCR = 158% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shawville Generating Station safety composite

Shawville Generating Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Shawville Generating Station held a steady TCR band

Shawville Generating Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Shawville, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 158% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/46
  • PHOTO Newark Energy Center
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Newark Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Shawville Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shawville Generating Station averages 1.9 TCR (158% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shawville Generating Station TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=6 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Shawville Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 46 Electric power generation, fos employers in Pennsylvania.

Shawville Generating Station (32 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Shawville Generating Station
Shawville Generating Station (32 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Shawville Generating Station has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.3 3.2 2 0 0
2022 6.0 3.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · PA · Shawville

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Newark Energy Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR A.S. King Plant 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seward Operating, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magic Valley Generating Station 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE KNOUSE FRUITLANDS, INC. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paramount Mushroom Farms LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wharf 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAJ Mushroom 32 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbus Association for the Performing Arts 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bemo USA Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Flint Ethanol, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid Atlantic Construction Group 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rainbow Seating, LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Beef LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kramski North America Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winsupply of Cleveland 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.