Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing · North Carolina

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE

Durham, NC · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE: 3.6 TCR = 108% of Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE safety composite

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE: 0.0 → 7.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2022

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE's TCR rose 7.2 from 0.0 in 2021 to 7.2 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Durham, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 108% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Winooski
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Winooski (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE averages 3.6 TCR (108% of the Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=7.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE falls in its industry

213 Laboratory analytical instrume establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Laboratory analytical instrume employers in North Carolina.

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE (28 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE
Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE (28 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. SOE has fewer employees than the Laboratory analytical instruments (excep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · NC · Durham

213 Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Winooski 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quantum Design 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlsbad, CA 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fremont, CA 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE H & D Farms, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMITH FARMS 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael Morris Farms 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elkin Hatchery 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR FRP Sheet Metal Contracting Corp 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Baton Rouge 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Small Parts Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilb Landscaping, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chase Evanston 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knoxville 072 LLc dba Two men and a truck 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Juice Plant 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03957 - Butterfield Station Landfill 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.