Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · New Jersey

Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery

Hamilton, NJ · ~140 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery: 0.3 TCR = 15% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery safety composite

Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2021

Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery injury rate improved

Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.0 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Hamilton, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/47
  • PHOTO Lyle Machinery
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lyle Machinery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery averages 0.3 TCR (15% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 47 Industrial equipment and machi employers in New Jersey.

Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery (140 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery
Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery (140 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery has more employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2016 1.0 0.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NJ · Hamilton

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 85 employers in Hamilton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lyle Machinery 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Texas North Louisianna : SVC-San Antonio TX-USA 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Indy-Catawba 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modern Machinery - Missoula 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plant 02 - SH 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orora Visual New Jersey 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robertet Frangrances 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Contract Filling Inc 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR RWJ University Hospital at Hamilton 1,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allies, Inc. 883 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJTRN - TRENTON 489 FTE
CITY-NEAR TRENTON (NJTRN) 485 FTE
NAT-TCR 3495-50CR002 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Gulfport Memorial 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpharetta Golden Peanut Headquarters 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Distribution South Campus 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4765-MIACC1601 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland Health Care Center Prosperity Oaks 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE J-S Irving Operations, LP 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE 08 - Aurora 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.