Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Mississippi

Lyle Machinery

Richland, MS · ~223 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lyle Machinery runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Lyle Machinery: 0.3 TCR = 15% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lyle Machinery safety composite

Lyle Machinery scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2021→2024

Lyle Machinery injury rate improved

Lyle Machinery's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Richland, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/29
  • PHOTO Commercial HVAC Amer…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~223 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Texas North Louisianna : SVC-San Antonio TX-USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Lyle Machinery in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lyle Machinery averages 0.3 TCR (15% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lyle Machinery TCR series: 2021=1.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Lyle Machinery falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 29 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Mississippi.

Lyle Machinery (223 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lyle Machinery
Lyle Machinery (223 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Lyle Machinery has more employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MS · Richland

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 61 employers in Richland, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Texas North Louisianna : SVC-San Antonio TX-USA 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Indy-Catawba 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modern Machinery - Missoula 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gulf Coast Pre-Stress Partners 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Syntron Material Handling 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunter Engineering Company Durant Manufacturing Plant 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Madison 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Irby Constuction Company 1,714 FTE
CITY-NEAR Total Trans of MS LLC 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson, MS (WC TT JJAT) 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Irby Construction 1,099 FTE
NAT-TCR FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation, Madison WI 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 911 Emergency Call Center 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosemont 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bi-Mart Headquarters 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wyco Field Services, LLC 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bluffton Regional Medical Center 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sugar Land 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norrell Construction 223 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.