Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Colorado

Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility

Englewood, CO · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility: 2.0 TCR = 70% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility safety composite

Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility: 0.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2022

Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility's TCR rose 4.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 4.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Englewood, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 70% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #64/148
  • PHOTO E.W. Burman, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: E.W. Burman, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility averages 2.0 TCR (70% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=4 · BLS 2.9

Where Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 148 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Colorado.

Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility (34 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility
Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility (34 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CO · Englewood

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 325 employers in Englewood, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR E.W. Burman, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kulback's, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bentley Builders LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ironclad Services LLC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nucla Generating Station 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Colorado Maintenance Center 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Limon Headquarters 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brikor Associates Inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR WAH - East and West 2,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Meridian 2,030 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swedish Medical Center 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR ULA-Denver 1,324 FTE
NAT-TCR Forest Pines 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at National Aquarium Institute 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Samford Univ Food Court 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodyear Rickenbacker LC. (SMRU80062) 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Massey Services 66 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twitter 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE MSCC Sub Vendors 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crs Philadephia 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.